Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper presents a quantitative comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology. Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six benchmark datasets. The datasets, evaluation details, and instructions for submitting new models are available online at http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Steven M. Seitz
Brian Curless
James Diebel
Stanford University
University of Washington
Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seitz et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dafe6f8988aeabbe687fac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2006.19