Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The discrepancy between cigarette smoking status reported during an interview and measured level of serum cotinine, a nicotine biomarker, was investigated in a representative sample of the US population aged >/=17 years (N = 15,357). Data were collected from participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). Among self-reported smokers, 7.5% (95% confidence interval: 6.3, 8.7) had a serum cotinine level less than or equal to 15.0 ng/ml, the selected cutoff point for identifying nonsmokers. Age (p < 0.01), race/ethnicity (p < 0.01), and average number of cigarettes smoked per day (p < 0.01) were associated with these discrepant findings. Among self-reported nonsmokers, 1.4% (95% confidence interval: 1.1, 1.7) had a serum cotinine level greater than 15.0 ng/ml, the selected cutoff point for identifying smokers. Race/ethnicity (p < 0.01), education (p < 0.01), number of household members who smoked in the home (p = 0.03), and self-reported smoking status from an earlier home interview (p < 0.01) were associated with these discrepant findings. Differences in smoking patterns, including the extent of nicotine dosing, may explain most of the discrepancy observed among self-reported smokers, whereas deception regarding smoking status may explain most of the discrepancy among self-reported nonsmokers. This study provides evidence that self-reported smoking status among adult respondents to a population-based survey conducted in a private medical setting is accurate.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ralph S. Caraballo
American Journal of Epidemiology
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ralph S. Caraballo (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a121c47e407b26696343d40 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.8.807
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: