Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper presents a generic and patient-specific classification system designed for robust and accurate detection of ECG heartbeat patterns. The proposed feature extraction process utilizes morphological wavelet transform features, which are projected onto a lower dimensional feature space using principal component analysis, and temporal features from the ECG data. For the pattern recognition unit, feedforward and fully connected artificial neural networks, which are optimally designed for each patient by the proposed multidimensional particle swarm optimization technique, are employed. By using relatively small common and patient-specific training data, the proposed classification system can adapt to significant interpatient variations in ECG patterns by training the optimal network structure, and thus, achieves higher accuracy over larger datasets. The classification experiments over a benchmark database demonstrate that the proposed system achieves such average accuracies and sensitivities better than most of the current state-of-the-art algorithms for detection of ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) and supra-VEBs (SVEBs). Over the entire database, the average accuracy-sensitivity performances of the proposed system for VEB and SVEB detections are 98.3%-84.6% and 97.4%-63.5%, respectively. Finally, due to its parameter-invariant nature, the proposed system is highly generic, and thus, applicable to any ECG dataset.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Türker İnce
Research Council of Finland
Serkan Kıranyaz
Electrophysiology
Moncef Gabbouj
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Tampere University
İzmir University of Economics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
İnce et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7c4477ec05d9a7b89aa1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2009.2013934
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: