Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The traditional wisdom for building disk-based relational database management systems (DBMS) is to organize data in heavily-encoded blocks stored on disk, with a main memory block cache. In order to improve performance given high disk latency, these systems use a multi-threaded architecture with dynamic record-level locking that allows multiple transactions to access the database at the same time. Previous research has shown that this results in substantial overhead for on-line transaction processing (OLTP) applications 15. The next generation DBMSs seek to overcome these limitations with architecture based on main memory resident data. To overcome the restriction that all data fit in main memory, we propose a new technique, called anti-caching, where cold data is moved to disk in a transactionally-safe manner as the database grows in size. Because data initially resides in memory, an anti-caching architecture reverses the traditional storage hierarchy of disk-based systems. Main memory is now the primary storage device. We implemented a prototype of our anti-caching proposal in a high-performance, main memory OLTP DBMS and performed a series of experiments across a range of database sizes, workload skews, and read/write mixes. We compared its performance with an open-source, disk-based DBMS optionally fronted by a distributed main memory cache. Our results show that for higher skewed workloads the anti-caching architecture has a performance advantage over either of the other architectures tested of up to 9× for a data size 8× larger than memory.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin A. DeBrabant
John Brown University
Andrew Pavlo
Carnegie Mellon University
Stephen Tu
Google (United States)
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
John Brown University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
DeBrabant et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15a5b8814bf8ec9a4ee261 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.14778/2556549.2556575
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: