Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Modelling strategies for predicting the potential impacts of climate change on the natural distribution of species have often focused on the characterization of a species’ bioclimate envelope. A number of recent critiques have questioned the validity of this approach by pointing to the many factors other than climate that play an important part in determining species distributions and the dynamics of distribution changes. Such factors include biotic interactions, evolutionary change and dispersal ability. This paper reviews and evaluates criticisms of bioclimate envelope models and discusses the implications of these criticisms for the different modelling strategies employed. It is proposed that, although the complexity of the natural system presents fundamental limits to predictive modelling, the bioclimate envelope approach can provide a useful first approximation as to the potentially dramatic impact of climate change on biodiversity. However, it is stressed that the spatial scale at which these models are applied is of fundamental importance, and that model results should not be interpreted without due consideration of the limitations involved. A hierarchical modelling framework is proposed through which some of these limitations can be addressed within a broader, scale‐dependent context.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Richard G. Pearson
University College London
Terence P. Dawson
King's College London
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Mansfield University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pearson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d69ad3a70b37cec732f97f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x