Does constant-rate pacing alter the diurnal fluctuations of ventricular and atrial refractoriness compared to spontaneous sinus rhythm in patients with complete AV block?
Ventricular refractoriness is primarily influenced indirectly by autonomic tone via heart rate fluctuations, whereas atrial refractoriness is also affected by direct neural influences.
The relative significance of the direct and indirect effects of autonomic tone on diurnal fluctuations in human ventricular and atrial refractoriness are not well known. In this study, the circadian rhythms of ventricular and atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured by noninvasive programmed stimulation in ten patients (mean age 62 +/- 10 years) who had a permanent dual chamber pacemaker for complete atrioventricular (AV) block. The ERP was measured at 4-hour intervals during spontaneous sinus rhythm with ventricular pacing (day 1) and during constant-rate dual chamber pacing (day 2). Cosinor analysis showed the ventricular ERP to have a significant diurnal rhythm in sinus rhythm (amplitude, 12 msec; 95% confidence intervals 1-24 msec) but not during constant-rate pacing (amplitude, 4 msec; 95% confidence intervals -3-12 msec). The atrial ERP had a significant rhythm at times of both spontaneous sinus rate (amplitude, 19 msec; confidence intervals 13-24 msec) and constant heart rate (amplitude, 11 msec; confidence intervals 1-21 msec) with acrophase during the sleeping hours. The increase in heart rate during dual chamber pacing resulted in a more marked decrease in the average 24-hour ERP in the ventricle than in the atrium (46 +/- 9 msec vs 12 +/- 6 msec, P < 0.01). Thus, refractoriness is more rate dependent in the ventricle than in the atrium, and autonomic influences on ventricular refractoriness are mainly indirect, via fluctuations in the sinus rate, but atrial refractoriness is also affected by direct neural influences and/or other rate independent factors.
Huikuri et al. (1995) studied this question.