Modern pacemaker and ICD systems subjected to 1.5 T MRI scans showed no device dysfunction, minimal heating (<0.5 degrees C), and limited tissue damage comparable to controls.
Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) (n=18)
1.5 T MRI scan vs No MRI (controls) (3- to 4-hour scans)
Lead heating, device function, force acting on the device, and image distortion
BACKGROUND: MRI has unparalleled soft-tissue imaging capabilities. The presence of devices such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs), however, is historically considered a contraindication to MRI. These devices are now smaller, with less magnetic material and improved electromagnetic interference protection. Our aim was to determine whether these modern systems can be used in an MR environment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested in vitro and in vivo lead heating, device function, force acting on the device, and image distortion at 1.5 T. Clinical MR protocols and in vivo measurements yielded temperature changes <0.5 degrees C. Older (manufactured before 2000) ICDs were damaged by the MR scans. Newer ICD systems and most pacemakers, however, were not. The maximal force acting on newer devices was <100 g. Modern (manufactured after 2000) ICD systems were implanted in dogs (n=18), and after 4 weeks, 3- to 4-hour MR scans were performed (n=15). No device dysfunction occurred. The images were of high quality with distortion dependent on the scan sequence and plane. Pacing threshold and intracardiac electrogram amplitude were unchanged over the 8 weeks, except in 1 animal that, after MRI, had a transient (<12 hours) capture failure. Pathological data of the scanned animals revealed very limited necrosis or fibrosis at the tip of the lead area, which was not different from controls (n=3) not subjected to MRI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that certain modern pacemaker and ICD systems may indeed be MRI safe. This may have major clinical implications for current imaging practices.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ariel Roguin
Interventional Cardiology
Menekhem M. Zviman
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Glenn R. Meininger
ATP Clinical Research (United States)
Circulation
Johns Hopkins University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roguin et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) (n=18). 1.5 T MRI scan vs. No MRI (controls) was evaluated on Lead heating, device function, force acting on the device, and image distortion. Modern pacemaker and ICD systems subjected to 1.5 T MRI scans showed no device dysfunction, minimal heating (<0.5 degrees C), and limited tissue damage comparable to controls.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16d9851375058a29056d72 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000137121.28722.33