Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIM: To explore resident and faculty perceptions of the feedback process, especially residents' feedback-seeking activities. METHODS: We conducted focus groups of faculty and residents exploring experiences in giving and receiving feedback, feedback-seeking, and suggestions to support feedback-seeking. Using qualitative methods and an iterative process, all authors analyzed the transcribed audiotapes to identify and confirm themes. RESULTS: Emerging themes fit a framework situating resident feedback-seeking as dependent on four central factors: (1) learning/workplace culture, (2) relationships, (3) purpose/quality of feedback, (4) emotional responses to feedback. Residents and faculty agreed on many supports and barriers to feedback-seeking. Strengthening the workplace/learning culture through longitudinal experiences, use of feedback forms and explicit expectations for residents to seek feedback, coupled with providing a sense of safety and adequate time for observation and providing feedback were suggested. Tensions between faculty and resident perceptions regarding feedback-seeking related to fear of being found deficient, the emotional costs related to corrective feedback and perceptions that completing clinical work is more valued than learning. CONCLUSION: Resident feedback-seeking is influenced by multiple factors requiring attention to both faculty and learner roles. Further study of specific influences and strategies to mitigate the tensions will inform how best to support residents in seeking feedback.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dianne Delva
Joan Sargeant
Stephen G. Miller
Medical Teacher
University of Toronto
Dalhousie University
Saint John Regional Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Delva et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1282ebf7bd4f5c7da6707c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.806791
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: