Addition of PEEP in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and PAWP >18 mm Hg was safe and augmented cardiac output, with a mean increase of 500 ml/min in the high PAWP group.
Observational (n=21)
Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (n=21)
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs Baseline (before PEEP)
Cardiac output (CO)
The effect of PEEP on cardiac performance was evaluated in 21 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Twenty-three data sets were divided into three groups according to pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP). In three of four group A data sets (PAWP = 12 mm Hg), cardiac output (CO) decreased when PEEP was added. In four of six group B data sets (PAWP = 14-18 mm Hg) and in 12 of 13 group C data sets (PAWP less than or equal to 19 mm Hg), CO increased with addition of PEEP. In group C, the mean increase in CO was 500 ml/min, and the mean level of best PEEP was 3.9 cm H2O. When PAWP exceeded 18 mm Hg, PEEP was safe and in many instances augmented CO.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael P. Grace
RTX (United States)
Dennis M. Greenbaum
Harlem Hospital Center
Critical Care Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Grace et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (n=21). Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs. Baseline (before PEEP) was evaluated on Cardiac output (CO). Addition of PEEP in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and PAWP >18 mm Hg was safe and augmented cardiac output, with a mean increase of 500 ml/min in the high PAWP group.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1013ddd13714ec96ff1f81 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198206000-00002