Combined use of heart rate variability and traditional risk markers improves prediction of arrhythmic events and sudden death after myocardial infarction, yielding 30%-50% positive predictive accuracy.
Acute myocardial infarction
Heart rate variability (HRV) vs Left ventricular function
Arrhythmic events and sudden death
Heart rate variability (HRV) is considered to represent a noninvasive tool to assess cardiac autonomic tone at the level of the sinus node. It has been shown to have predictive power for risk assessment in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. For this purpose, HRV should be assessed from 24-hour Holter recordings obtained 7-10 days following the infarction. Although there is some recovery of HRV during the first 3 months after infarction, HRV remains reduced in postinfarction patients compared to values obtained in healthy individuals. Compared to assessment of left ventricular function as a risk marker, HRV is superior with respect to prediction of arrhythmic events and sudden death whereas both parameters yield comparative power for prediction of total cardiac mortality. Since the predictive power of HRV analysis alone is relatively low, the combined use of HRV measurements together with traditional risk markers (such as ventricular ectopic beats, signal-averaged ECG, or left ventricular function) results in improved risk prediction with positive predictive accuracy in the range of 30%-50%.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Electrophysiology
Thomas Klingenheben
Praxis
Markus Zabel
Electrophysiology
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Goethe University Frankfurt
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hohnloser et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction. Heart rate variability (HRV) vs. Left ventricular function was evaluated on Arrhythmic events and sudden death. Combined use of heart rate variability and traditional risk markers improves prediction of arrhythmic events and sudden death after myocardial infarction, yielding 30%-50% positive predictive accuracy.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a222528b16ee1c82e4924ac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06109.x