Does prasugrel reduce ischemic events compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention?
Patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention
Prasugrel
Clopidogrel
Ischemic eventshard clinical
In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, prasugrel reduces ischemic events and stent thrombosis compared to clopidogrel, but at the cost of an increased risk of major and fatal bleeding.
Background: Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine is a cornerstone of treatment to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: To compare prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, with clopidogrel, we randomly assigned 13,608 patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg daily maintenance dose), for 6 to 15 months. The primary efficacy end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key safety end point was major bleeding. Results: The primary efficacy end point occurred in 12.1% of patients receiving clopidogrel and 9.9% of patients receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel, 0.81; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001). We also found significant reductions in the prasugrel group in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.7% for clopidogrel vs. 7.4% for prasugrel; P<0.001), urgent target-vessel revascularization (3.7% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 2.4% of patients receiving prasugrel and in 1.8% of patients receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.68; P=0.03). Also greater in the prasugrel group was the rate of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.9%; P=0.01), including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio, 1.25; P=0.23) and fatal bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P=0.002). Conclusions: In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding. Overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097591 .)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stephen D. Wiviott
Eugene Braunwald
Carolyn H. McCabe
New England Journal of Medicine
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Inserm
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wiviott et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1a69299cd3de2c801d6b6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0706482
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: