Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
While a concerted quest for accuracy is seen by many journalists as central to their professional identity, rules of practice for achieving news accuracy are elusive and highly nuanced. We conducted post hoc interviews with 28 semi-randomly selected Canadian journalists working for French- and Englishlanguage ; each journalist reconstructed in detail the process of verification used in reporting a newspaper story. Findings suggest considerable diversity in verification strategies, at times mirroring scientific methods (source triangulation, analysis of primary data sources or official documents, semiparticipant - tion), and different degrees of reflexivity or critical awareness of journalists’ own blind and limitations. Most interviewees expressed passionate support for the norm of verification, but a range of pragmatic compromises when selecting various types of facts for, and when conducting,. Proper names, numbers and some other concrete details were verified with greater care than some types of factual statement. On the other hand, statements were frequently relayed, with or without, based on a single subject’s word. We also observed that verification cannot easily or consistently be as a distinct process within the normal course of reporting: rather, the relationship between the and verification processes may often be circular, and some verification rests in knowledge derived a reporter’s earlier work.
Shapiro et al. (Tue,) studied this question.