Modelling Cross-Border Integration: The Role of Borders as a Resource

AbstractCross-border integration is a multifaceted as well as contextually contingent process. While various conceptualisations have been developed, the theoretical foundations of the concept appear insufficient in order to grasp the very significance of such a process of cross-border regionalism. In order to help make sense of the diversity of configurations observed, this article seeks to deconstruct the concept according to the role played by the border as a resource and to develop a theoretical framework based on two contrasted models of cross-border integration. The underlying hypothesis is that cross-border integration does not derive from the mere opening of national borders that it supposedly helps at the same time to remove, but stems from the strategic behaviour of actors who actively mobilise borders as resources. The first model, called 'geo-economic', is mainly based on the mobilisation of the border as a differential benefit and aims to generate value out of asymmetric cross-border interactions. In doing so, this process of functional integration is likely to increase cross-border socio-economic disparities and leads to cooperation oriented towards instrumental purposes such as increasing the economic utility of the border or regulating negative externalities. The second model, called 'territorial project', emphasises the border resources that involve a convergence of both sides of a border, either through a process of hybridisation/innovation or via the territorial and symbolic recognition borders entail. In this process of place-making that transcends the border, mutual understanding and trust between the actors is seen to be key and the willingness to cooperate essential. Conceived as ideal-types, the two models of cross-border integration are contrasted and to some extent contradictory. They are however not mutually exclusive and different kinds of combinations are examined based on concrete examples. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research is part of the EUBORDERSCAPES project (SSH.2011.4.2-1-290775) funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme.Notes1. M. Perkmann and N.-L. Sum, Globalization, Regionalization, and Cross-border Regions (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2002).2. See notably R. Ratti, 'Spatial and Economic Effects of Frontiers: Overview of Traditional and New Approaches and Theories of Border Area Development', in R. Ratti and S. Reichman (eds.), Theory and Practice of Transborder Cooperation (Basel: Verlag Helbing O. J. Martínez, Border People (Tucson: University of Arizona Press 1996); A. Decoville, F. Durand, C. Sohn, and O. Walther, 'Comparing Cross-border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: Towards a Functional Typology', Journal of Borderlands Studies 28/2 (2013) pp. 221–237; B. Reitel, 'Border Temporality and Space Integration in the European Transborder Agglomeration Basel', Journal of Borderlands Studies 28/2 (2013) pp. 239–256.3. Martínez (note 2).4. H. Van Houtum, 'Borders of Comfort: Spatial Economic Bordering Processes in and by the European Union', Regional N. Hansen, 'Border Regions: A Critique of Spatial Theory and a European Case Study', The Annals of Regional Science 11/1 (1977) pp. 1–14; J. Anderson and E. Wever, 'Borders, Border Regions and Economic Integration: One World, Ready or Not', Journal of Borderlands Studies 18/1 (2003) pp. 27–38.10. See for instance Martínez (note 2); K.-J. Lundquist and M. Trippl, 'Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-border Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis', Regional Studies 47/3 (2013) p. 455.11. L. A. Herzog, Where North Meets South: Cities, Space, and Politics on the United States-Mexico Border (Austin: University of Texas Press 1990).12. ESPON, Metroborder. Cross-Border Polycentric Metropolitan Regions. Final Report. (Luxembourg: ESPON 2010), available at , accessed 16 Sep. 2013.13. T. Alegría, Metrópolis Transfronteriza: Revisión de La Hipótesis y Evidencias de Tijuana, México y San Diego, Estados Unidos (Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte 2009).14. Van Houtum, 'Overview' (note 8).15. J. Buursink, 'The Binational Reality of Border-Crossing Cities', GeoJournal 54/1 (2001) pp. 7–19.16. Ibid., p. 17.17. R. Gielis and H. van Houtum, 'Sloterdijk in the House! Dwelling in the Borderscape of Germany and The Netherlands', Geopolitics 17/4 (2012) pp. 797–817.18. P. De Boe, C. Grasland, and A. Healy, Spatial Integration, Final Report, 1999, available at , accessed 10 Sep. 2013.19. Ibid.20. M. Perkmann, 'Cross-Border Regions in Europe. Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-border Co-operation', European Urban and Regional Studies 10/2 (2003) p. 157.21. Decoville et al. (note 2).22. De Boe et al. (note 18).23. C. Sohn, B. Reitel, and O. Walther, 'Cross-Border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: The Case of Luxembourg, Basel, and Geneva', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27/5 (2009) pp. 922–939.24. Reitel, 'Border Temporality' (note 2).25. C. Sohn (ed.), Luxembourg: An Emerging Cross-Border Metropolitan Region (Brussels: PIE Peter Lang 2012).26. M. B. Sparke, 'Not a State, but More Than a State of Mind: Cascading Cascadias and the Geoeconomics of Crossborder Regionalism', in M. Perkmann and N.-L. Sum (eds.), Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions (London: Palgrave 2002) pp. 212–238.27. M. S. van Geenhuizen and R. Ratti, Gaining Advantage from Open Borders: An Active Space Approach to Regional Development (Aldershot: Ashgate Pub Ltd 2001).28. D. Newman, 'The Lines That Continue to Separate Us: Borders in Our "Borderless" World', Progress in Human Geography 30/2 (2006) pp. 143–161.29. E. Brunet-Jailly, 'Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective', Geopolitics 10/4 (2005) pp. 633–649.30. L. O'Dowd, 'From a "Borderless World" to a "World of Borders": "Bringing History Back In"', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28/6 (2010) pp. 1031–1050.31. A. Paasi, 'Boundaries as Social Processes: Territoriality in the World of Flows', Geopolitics 3/1 (1998) pp. 69–88.32. L. O'Dowd, 'The Changing Significance of European Borders', Regional D. Newman and A. Paasi, 'Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography', Progress in Human Geography 22/2 (1998) pp. 186–207.34. O'Dowd, 'The Changing Significance' (note 32).35. C. Raffestin, 'Eléments Pour Une Théorie de La Frontière', Diogène 34/134 (1986) pp. 3–21; H. Van Houtum and T. Van Naerssen, 'Bordering, Ordering and Othering', Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 93/2 (2002) pp. 125–136.36. H. N. Nicol and J. Minghi, 'The Continuing Relevance of Borders in Contemporary Contexts', Geopolitics 10/4 (2005) pp. 680–687.37. J. Blatter, 'Beyond Hierarchies and Networks: Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces', Governance 16/4 (2003) pp. 503–526.38. A. Niebuhr and S. Stiller, Integration Effects in Border Regions: A Survey of Economic Theory and Empirical Studies, HWWA discussion paper, 2002, available at , accessed 5 Sep. 2013.39. M. B. Sparke, J. D. Sidaway, T. Bunnell, and C. Grundy-Warr, 'Triangulating the Borderless World: Geographies of Power in the Indonesia–Malaysia–Singapore Growth Triangle', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29/4 (2004) pp. 485–498.40. See for instance P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, and I. Salomon, 'Barriers in Spatial Interactions and Communications', The Annals of Regional Science 24/4 (1990) pp. 237–252; Ratti, 'Spatial and Economic Effects' (note 2); H. Van Houtum, 'The Development of Cross-Border Economic Relations' (Tilburg: University of Tilburg 1998).41. Lösch (note 9).42. Sohn et al. (note 23).43. P. Balogh, 'Sleeping Abroad but Working at Home: Cross-Border Residential Mobility Between Transnationalism and (Re)Bordering', Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 95/2 (2013) pp. 189–204.44. D. Newman, 'On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework', Journal of Borderlands Studies 18/1 (2003) pp. 13–25.45. M. J. Dear and G. Leclerc, Postborder City: Cultural Spaces of Bajalta California (London: Routledge 2003).46. B. Reitel, 'Governance in Cross-border Agglomerations in Europe – the Examples of Basle and Strasbourg', Europa Regional 14/1 (2006) pp. 9–21.47. J. W. Scott, 'European Politics of Borders, Border Symbolism and Cross-Border Cooperation', in T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan (eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2012) p. 86.48. G.-J. Hospers, 'Borders, Bridges and Branding: The Transformation of the Øresund Region into an Imagined Space', European Planning Studies 14/8 (2006) pp. 1015–1033.49. H. Knippenberg, 'The Maas-Rhine Euroregion: A Laboratory for European Integration?', Geopolitics 9/3 (2004) p. 611.50. See respectively, for example, P. Gerber, 'Advancement in Conceptualizing Cross-Border Daily Mobility: The Benelux Context in the European Union', European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 12/2 (2012) pp. 178–197; G. H. Hanson, 'US–Mexico Integration and Regional Economies: Evidence from Border-City Pairs', Journal of Urban Economics 50/2 (2001) pp. 259–287; B. Spierings and M. Van Der Velde, 'Shopping, Borders and Unfamiliarity: Consumer Mobility in Europe', Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 99/4 (2008) pp. 497–505; Balogh (note 43).51. Decoville et al. (note 2).52. Anderson and Wever (note 9).53. J. Blatter and N. Clement, 'Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe: Historical Development, Institutionalization, and Contrasts with North America', Journal of Borderlands Studies 15/1 (2000) pp. 14–53.54. The reference to the instrumental purpose of cross-border cooperation is borrowed from G. Göhler, 'Begriffliche Und Konzeptionelle Überlegungen Zur Theorie Politischer Institutionen', in G. Göhler (ed.), Die Eigenart Der Institutionen: Zum Profil Politischer Institutionentheorie (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1994).55. J. Parsonage, 'Southeast Asia's "Growth Triangle": A Subregional Response to Global Transformation', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16/2 (1992) pp. 307–317.56. Sparke et al. (note 39).57. K. Staudt, C. M. Fuentes, and J. E. M. Fragoso (eds.), Cities and Citizenship at the US-Mexico Border: The Paso Del Norte Metropolitan Region (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2010).58. R. D. Sack, Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History, Vol. 7 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986).59. See respectively Reitel, 'Governance' (note 46); and Lundquist and Trippl (note 10).60. Göhler (note 54).61. This focus on European cases is explained by the author's scientific competencies. In principle, North American examples could also be mobilised in order to illustrate the relevance of the theoretical models despite obvious differences in bordering dynamics, their significance and their contexts.62. Sohn, Luxembourg (note 25).63. C. W. Matthiessen, 'The Öresund Area: Pre-and Post-Bridge Cross-Border Functional Integration: The Bi-National Regional Question', GeoJournal 61/1 (2004) pp. 31–39.64. P. A. Hansen and G. Serin, 'Integration Strategies and Barriers to Co-Operation in Cross-Border Regions: Case Study of the Øresund Region', Journal of Borderlands Studies 22/2 (2007) pp. 39–56.65. Hospers (note 48).66. According to OCSTAT, there were 63,000 cross-border workers registered in 2013, to which must be added around 9,000 international officials and 40,000 Swiss citizens who live in France and work in Geneva. Available at , accessed 24 July 2013.67. M. B. Sparke, 'A Neoliberal Nexus: Economy, Security and the Biopolitics of Citizenship on the Border', Political Geography 25/2 (2006) pp. 151–180.68. Martínez (note 2); Lundquist and Trippl (note 10).69. M. Perkmann, 'Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25/6 (2007) pp. 861–879.70. Sohn et al. (note 23).71. B. Jessop and N.-L. Sum, 'An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong's Emerging Strategies in and for (inter) Urban Competition', Urban Studies 37/12 (2000) pp. 2287–2313.72. J. W. Scott, 'European and North American Contexts for Cross-Border Regionalism', Regional Studies 33/7 (1999) pp. 605–617.73. J. Lévy, 'Penser la ville: un impératif sous toutes les latitudes', Cahiers d'Etudes sur la Méditerranée Orientale et le monde Turco-Iranien 24 (1997) pp. 2–9.