Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is not associated with a reduction in death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with non-left bundle branch block QRS morphology (HR 0.99).
Meta-Analysis (n=6,523)
Yes
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy reduce death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with heart failure with reduced LVEF and non-left bundle branch block QRS morphology?
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy does not reduce mortality or heart failure hospitalization in heart failure patients with non-LBBB QRS morphology, challenging current guideline recommendations.
Hazard Ratio: 0.99 (95% CI 0.82–1.2)
OBJECTIVES: Recently published clinical guidelines recommend cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced LVEF and non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) QRS morphology. We sought to define the potential benefit of CRT in these patients through meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have reported outcomes in patients with non-LBBB QRS morphology. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for RCTs of CRT that reported outcomes according to QRS morphology. We performed meta-analysis of these RCTs to assess the effect of CRT on the end points of death, HF hospitalisation, and the composite of death and HF hospitalisation. RESULTS: Five RCTs were analysed, including 6523 participants (1766 with non-LBBB QRS morphology). CRT was not associated with a reduction in death and/or HF hospitalisation in subjects with non-LBBB QRS morphology (HR 0.99 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20). CONCLUSIONS: CRT is not associated with a reduction in death or HF hospitalisation in patients with non-LBBB QRS morphology. Wide QRS with non-LBBB morphology remains an area of uncertainty for CRT, which is included in the recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines with a weaker strength of recommendation, but is not supported by a dedicated RCT.
Cunnington et al. (2015) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with reduced LVEF and non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) QRS morphology (n=6,523). Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) vs. Optimal medical therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alone was evaluated on Composite of death and heart failure hospitalisation (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20). Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is not associated with a reduction in death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with non-left bundle branch block QRS morphology (HR 0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: