Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Changes in criteria and differences in populations studied and methodology have produced a wide range of prevalence estimates for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Uniform criteria were applied to harmonized data from 11 studies from USA, Europe, Asia and Australia, and MCI prevalence estimates determined using three separate definitions of cognitive impairment. RESULTS: The published range of MCI prevalence estimates was 5.0%-36.7%. This was reduced with all cognitive impairment definitions: performance in the bottom 6.681% (3.2%-10.8%); Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5 (1.8%-14.9%); Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24-27 (2.1%-20.7%). Prevalences using the first definition were 5.9% overall, and increased with age (P < .001) but were unaffected by sex or the main races/ethnicities investigated (Whites and Chinese). Not completing high school increased the likelihood of MCI (P ≤ .01). CONCLUSION: Applying uniform criteria to harmonized data greatly reduced the variation in MCI prevalence internationally.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Perminder S. Sachdev
Darren M. Lipnicki
Nicole A. Kochan
PLoS ONE
University of Michigan
Columbia University
University of Cambridge
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sachdev et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a036acdca491f81056973f9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142388
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: