Home-based telerehabilitation was no different from other delivery models for improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, though adherence was higher.
Systematic Review
Does home-based telerehabilitation improve physical or functional outcomes in adult patients with cardiopulmonary diseases compared to other delivery models?
Home-based telerehabilitation shows similar efficacy to center-based models for exercise capacity and quality of life in cardiopulmonary patients, with potentially higher adherence.
In Brief PURPOSE: To examine the effects of telerehabilitation compared with other delivery models for improving physical or functional outcomes in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. METHODS: A search was completed for English language publications from 1990 to August 2013 across 4 electronic databases and gray literature. Inclusion criteria were: (1) home-based telerehabilitation as a core component; (2) at least 2 exercise sessions; (3) randomized controlled trials; and (4) reporting of physical or functional outcome measures in adult patients with coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, and chronic respiratory disease. Studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers and graded by a reviewer according to the Downs and Black checklist. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was undertaken. RESULTS: Eleven studies were analyzed. It appears that telerehabilitation is no different to other delivery models for patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, in terms of exercise capacity expressed as distance on the 6-minute walk test and peak oxygen consumption and quality of life. Telerehabilitation appears to have higher adherence rates compared with center-based exercise. There has been similar or no adverse events reported in telerehabilitation compared with center-based exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Although telerehabilitation shows promise in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, compelling evidence is still limited. There is a need for more detailed, high-quality studies and for studies on the use of video-based telerehabilitation. This review examines the effects of telerehabilitation compared with other delivery models for improving physical or functional outcomes in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Systematic review and grading of quality of literature was undertaken on 11 studies. Although telerehabilitation shows promise in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, compelling evidence is still limited.
Hwang et al. (Sat,) conducted a systematic review in Cardiopulmonary diseases. Home-based telerehabilitation vs. Other delivery models (including center-based exercise) was evaluated on Physical or functional outcomes (exercise capacity and quality of life). Home-based telerehabilitation was no different from other delivery models for improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, though adherence was higher.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: