Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Incomplete reporting has been identified as a major source of avoidable waste in biomedical research. Essential information is often not provided in study reports, impeding the identification, critical appraisal, and replication of studies. To improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement was developed. Here we present STARD 2015, an updated list of 30 essential items that should be included in every report of a diagnostic accuracy study. This update incorporates recent evidence about sources of bias and variability in diagnostic accuracy and is intended to facilitate the use of STARD. As such, STARD 2015 may help to improve completeness and transparency in reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Patrick M. Bossuyt
Johannes B. Reitsma
David E. Bruns
Clinical Chemistry
Harvard University
University of Oxford
Inserm
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bossuyt et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dff65a1827a1d0b1255883 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: