Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A recent questionnaire survey of the life-effects of narcolepsy in 180 patients, 60 each from North American, Asian and European populations, compared to similarly distributed age and sex matched controls, documented multiple and marked effects on work, education, driving, accidents, recreation, personality, memory and other parameters. The data have now been further analysed according to the patients' geographic (culturo-genetic) origin and to a number of other patient and illness variables. The three different geographic populations showed few significant differences for the some 160 life-effects items in the questionnaire. This strongly indicates that these are an integral part of the disease or of the human reactions to it. Most of the few significant population differences appeared cultural in origin (e.g., concerning driving records, personality changes), although a few may possibly reflect genetic differences (e.g., visual problems). Analysis of the pooled data according to respondees' age, sex, age at illness onset, duration of illness and treatment led again to relatively few significant findings. It is concluded that, in general, once the disease has been diagnosed, all the major life effects are present and remain so. The results strongly support the contention that most life-effects are not related to the diagnostic 'tetrad' symptoms themselves but rather to excessive daytime sleepiness, the symptoms most resistant to ant-narcoleptic treatment.
Broughton et al. (Sun,) studied this question.