Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Smartphone addiction is a recent concern that has resulted from the dramatic increase in worldwide smartphone use. This study assessed the risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction in college students and compared these factors to those linked to Internet addiction. METHODS: College students (N = 448) in South Korea completed the Smartphone Addiction Scale, the Young's Internet Addiction Test, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, the Beck Depression Inventory I, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Trait Version), the Character Strengths Test, and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: The risk factors for smartphone addiction were female gender, Internet use, alcohol use, and anxiety, while the protective factors were depression and temperance. In contrast, the risk factors for Internet addiction were male gender, smartphone use, anxiety, and wisdom/knowledge, while the protective factor was courage. Discussion These differences may result from unique features of smartphones, such as high availability and primary use as a tool for interpersonal relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings will aid clinicians in distinguishing between predictive factors for smartphone and Internet addiction and can consequently be utilized in the prevention and treatment of smartphone addiction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sam-Wook Choi
Namseoul University
Dai‐Jin Kim
PDK International
Jung‐Seok Choi
Samsung Medical Center
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Catholic University of Korea
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul National University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Choi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a224d921b095894fc4eef66 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.043
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: