Application of sex-specific hs-cTnI cut points compared with an overall cut point did not improve net reclassification for 1-year MACE (NRIevents -1.5%; 95% CI -4.0% to 1.1%).
Observational (n=2,841)
Yes
Does hs-cTnI risk stratification using sex-specific cut points improve the prediction of 1-year MACE in ED patients with possible acute coronary syndromes compared to an overall cut point?
Sex-specific cut points for high-sensitivity troponin I improve identification of women at risk but have minimal net effect on risk reclassification across the whole ED population compared to an overall cut point.
Effect estimate: NRIevents -1.5% (95% CI -4.0% to 1.1%)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year in emergency department (ED) patients with possible acute coronary syndromes, stratified by high sensitivity troponin (hs-cTnI) concentrations using sex-specific cut points compared with overall cut points. METHODS: In a multicentre observational study of 2841 patients, presentation hs-cTnI concentrations were categorised using sex-specific (women 16 ng/L; men 34 ng/L) and overall (26 ng/L) cut points. The primary outcome was MACE occurring within 1 year of presentation. Patients with hs-cTnI values concentrations within these categories were reported by sex and 1-year MACE. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) was computed to measure the change in prediction after altering the hs-cTnI cut points, and was calculated separately for events and non-events. RESULTS: Application of sex-specific 99th percentile cut points rather than the overall cut point of 26 ng/L, reclassified 25 females from having a non-elevated troponin to having an elevated troponin, and 29 males from having an elevated troponin value to having a non-elevated troponin value on presentation. Of these, 7 (28.0%) females and 12 (41.4%) males had a 1-year MACE. There was no reclassification improvement for those with or without 1-year MACE (NRIevents=-1.5%, 95% CI -4.0% to 1.1%; NRInon-events -0.04%, 95% CI -0.5% to 0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Sex-specific cut points improve the identification of women but not men at risk for 1-year MACE. The net-effect across the whole ED population with possible cardiac chest pain is minimal. Lowering the clinical cut point for both sexes may be appropriate for prognostic purposes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN No. 21109279, ACTRN12609000283279.
Cullen et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in possible acute coronary syndromes (n=2,841). Sex-specific hs-cTnI cut points vs. Overall cut point (26 ng/L) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurring within 1 year of presentation (NRIevents -1.5%, 95% CI -4.0% to 1.1%). Application of sex-specific hs-cTnI cut points compared with an overall cut point did not improve net reclassification for 1-year MACE (NRIevents -1.5%; 95% CI -4.0% to 1.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: