Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered metaphysics proper. Yet what they meant by this, I argue, can only be understood by taking into account their own conception of metaphysics. Starting from Kant’s implicit distinction between general metaphysics and special metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason, I argue that Kant, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel engaged in the investigation that used to be carried out in general metaphysics. Focusing on the notion of a system of pure reason intimated in the Critique of Pure Reason, I show, moreover, that Kant’s successors, while misinterpreting the Kantian distinction between critique and system, elaborated a method that made it possible to produce a complete system of pure reason, albeit one that differed from the system Kant had in mind.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karin de Boer (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e04a0b1062f9a49d6c292 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2015_71_2_0267
Karin de Boer
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...