Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The authors show how certification assembles ‘sustainable’ territories through a complex layering of regulatory authority in which both government and nongovernment entities claim rule-making authority, sometimes working together, sometimes in parallel, sometimes competitively. It is argued that territorialisation is accomplished not just through (re)defining bounded space, but more broadly through the assembling of four elements: space, subjects, objects, and expertise. Four case studies of sustainability certification in seafood are analyzed to show that ‘green gabbing’ is not necessarily the central dynamic in assembling sustainable territories, and that certification always involves state agencies in determining how the key elements that comprise it are defined. Whereas some state agencies have been suspicious of sustainability certification, others have embraced it or even used it to extend their sovereignty.The authors call for more nuanced understandings of sustainability certification as made up of multiple logics beyond the market.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Vandergeest
York University
Stefano Ponte
Copenhagen Business School
Simon R. Bush
Wageningen University & Research
Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling
Environment and Planning A Economy and Space
Wageningen University & Research
York University
Copenhagen Business School
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vandergeest et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00cc62ef8139f8ff77a8e8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x15599297
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: