An automated NLP-based identification and predictive risk report increased heart failure identification sensitivity from 82.6% to 95.3% compared to manual methods, and reduced 30-day mortality.
Observational
No
Does an automated NLP-based identification and predictive risk report improve HF patient identification and clinical outcomes in hospitalized high-risk HF patients?
Implementation of an automated NLP-based identification and predictive risk report for hospitalized HF patients significantly improved patient identification, reduced clinician review time, and decreased 30-day mortality.
Absolute Event Rate: 95.3% vs 82.6%
OBJECTIVE: Develop and evaluate an automated identification and predictive risk report for hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS: Dictated free-text reports from the previous 24 h were analyzed each day with natural language processing (NLP), to help improve the early identification of hospitalized patients with HF. A second application that uses an Intermountain Healthcare-developed predictive score to determine each HF patient's risk for 30-day hospital readmission and 30-day mortality was also developed. That information was included in an identification and predictive risk report, which was evaluated at a 354-bed hospital that treats high-risk HF patients. RESULTS: The addition of NLP-identified HF patients increased the identification score's sensitivity from 82.6% to 95.3% and its specificity from 82.7% to 97.5%, and the model's positive predictive value is 97.45%. Daily multidisciplinary discharge planning meetings are now based on the information provided by the HF identification and predictive report, and clinician's review of potential HF admissions takes less time compared to the previously used manual methodology (10 vs 40 min). An evaluation of the use of the HF predictive report identified a significant reduction in 30-day mortality and a significant increase in patient discharges to home care instead of to a specialized nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: Using clinical decision support to help identify HF patients and automatically calculating their 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day mortality risks, coupled with a multidisciplinary care process pathway, was found to be an effective process to improve HF patient identification, significantly reduce 30-day mortality, and significantly increase patient discharges to home care.
Evans et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Hospitalized heart failure. Automated NLP-based identification and predictive risk report vs. Manual methodology was evaluated on Identification score sensitivity. An automated NLP-based identification and predictive risk report increased heart failure identification sensitivity from 82.6% to 95.3% compared to manual methods, and reduced 30-day mortality.