How does cardiac MRI compare to radionuclide ventriculography in detecting early subclinical deterioration in cardiac function in adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy?
RVG is a valuable tool for detecting early LVEF reduction during anthracycline therapy, while MRI can detect early structural changes like increased LV volume and mass.
PURPOSE: To compare cardiac MRI and radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in cardiac monitoring during anthracycline (doxorubicin)-based chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 10 previously untreated adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed by MRI and RVG simultaneously. In addition, left ventricular (LV) and left atrial size were determined by MRI. Both MRI and RVG measurements were determined at baseline and then repeated after eight cycles of CHOP chemotherapy (cumulative doxorubicin dose of 400 mg/m²). Power calculations were made on the basis of reproducibility measurements. RESULTS: Clinical heart failure was not observed in any patient during the study. MRI detected a statistically significant increase in LV end-diastolic volume (128 ± 39 vs. 151 ± 46 ml, P<0.05) and LV mass (119 ± 32 vs. 146 ± 49 g, P<0.05) after doxorubicin therapy but no change in LVEF (46 ± 8 vs. 47 ± 11%, P=NS) or left atrial area. A significant LVEF reduction compared with baseline was observed by RVG (61 ± 10 vs. 50 ± 6%, P<0.01). On average, MRI resulted in 7 ± 10% lower LVEF values compared with RVG. CONCLUSION: RVG seems to be a valuable and repeatable tool in detecting early, subclinical deterioration in cardiac function and is the method of choice in the follow-up of LV function during anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Whether LV volumetric and mass changes found in MRI could predict later significant permanent cardiac damage should be evaluated in larger studies with long-term follow-up.
Sipola et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: