Pressure but not angiotensin II-induced increases in wall mass or tone influences static and dynamic aortic mechanics

OBJECTIVE: To distinguish between static (due to slow changes in pressure) and dynamic (due to pressure pulsatility) components of aortic compliance over a large pressure range in vivo and to examine the effects of increased vascular mass and smooth muscle tone on these components. METHODS: Using ultrasound wall tracking, aortic lumen area-pressure curves were generated in anaesthetized rats over a broad range of pressures by altering blood volume. The compliance coefficient calculated at each mean pressure was considered the dynamic compliance at that pressure; the slope of the diastolic lumen area-pressure curve represents static compliance. Experiments were performed in control rats and rats treated with angiotensin II (ANG II) acutely (500 ng/kg per min intravenously) to modify vascular tone or chronically (250 ng/kg per min subcutaneously for 2 weeks) to modify vascular mass. RESULTS: The dynamic compliance-pressure curve approximated a parabola. Maximal dynamic compliance (0.272+/-0.026 mm2/kPa in control rats) was achieved at near-normotensive pressure (+/-105 mm Hg). The diastolic lumen area-pressure curve showed an exponential relationship within a physiological range (30-130 mm Hg). ANG II-induced increases in aortic wall mass or smooth muscle tone did not modify the relationship between static or dynamic compliance and pressure. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that static and dynamic mechanics of the rat thoracic aorta depend differently on blood pressure. Static compliance increases slightly with pressure in a physiological range, while dynamic compliance is auto-regulated around normotensive pressures. Neither static nor dynamic compliance of the rat thoracic aorta are influenced by ANG II-induced increases in aortic wall mass or smooth muscle tone.