Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The action potentials recorded from heart muscle with a suction electrode have been compared to those recorded with an intracellular microelectrode. It has been found that if the suction electrode is properly used the monophasic potentials recorded with it may be taken as a reliable index of the time of arrival of excitation at the electrode and as a reliable index of the shape of the action potential during the entire phase of repolarization. The suction electrode potentials differ from the microelectrode potentials in showing a lower rise velocity, a smaller amplitude, a quantitatively different reversal or overshoot and, in the beating heart, ‘afterpotentials’ caused by mechanical effects. When the shape of the action potential, as observed with the microelectrode, is changed by ions such as K + or Ca ++ a similar change is observed in the potential recorded with the suction electrodes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content
State University of New York
University of Vermont
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Hoffman et al. (Mon,) studied this question.