Interactive digital interventions significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (WMD -3.74 mmHg; 95% CI -2.19 to -2.58) and diastolic blood pressure compared to usual care in adults with hypertension.
Meta-Analysis
Hypertension
Interactive digital interventions (IDIs) vs Usual care
Change in SBP and DBP — WMD -3.74 mmHg (SBP) (-2.19 to -2.58)
Effect estimate: WMD -3.74 mmHg (SBP) (95% CI -2.19 to -2.58)
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence for using interactive digital interventions (IDIs) to support patient self-management of hypertension, and to determine their impact on control and reduction of blood pressure. METHOD: Systematic review with meta-analysis was undertaken with a search performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Library, DoPHER, TROPHI, Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index. The population was adults (>18 years) with hypertension, intervention was an IDI and the comparator was usual care. Primary outcomes were change in SBP and DBP. Only randomized controlled trials and studies published in journals and in English were eligible. Eligible IDIs included interventions accessed through a computer, smartphone or other hand-held device. RESULTS: Four out of seven studies showed a significantly greater reduction for intervention compared to usual care for SBP, with no difference found for three. Overall, IDIs significantly reduced SBP, with the weighted mean difference being -3.74 mmHg 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.19 to -2.58 with no heterogeneity observed (I-squared = 0.0%, P = 0.990). For DBP, four out of six studies indicated a greater reduction for intervention compared to controls, with no difference found for two. For DBP, a significant reduction of -2.37 mmHg (95% CI -0.40 to -4.35) was found, but considerable heterogeneity was noted (I-squared = 80.1%, P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: IDIs lower both SBP and DBP compared to usual care. Results suggest these findings can be applied to a wide range of healthcare systems and populations. However, sustainability and long-term clinical effectiveness of these interventions remain uncertain.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gary McLean
University of Glasgow
Rebecca Band
Swansea University
Kathryn Saunderson
Alzheimer Scotland
Journal of Hypertension
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
University College London
University of Glasgow
University of Southampton
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
McLean et al. (Thu,) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension. Interactive digital interventions (IDIs) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in SBP and DBP (WMD -3.74 mmHg (SBP), 95% CI -2.19 to -2.58). Interactive digital interventions significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (WMD -3.74 mmHg; 95% CI -2.19 to -2.58) and diastolic blood pressure compared to usual care in adults with hypertension.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10d4208102eb4b66ee8041 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000000859
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: