Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “ dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Garland
New York Law School
Punishment & Society
New York University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Garland (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d72baa5dca7d66cbbef110 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514541711
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: