Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Gail and Gart (1973) present tables showing the required sample size, n, for the Fisher-Irwin exact conditional test for 2 X 2 tables to achieve a power of at least 0.50, 0.80 and 0.90 against one-sided alternatives at the nominal .05 and .01 significance levels. However, calculations for n > 35 were based on the Arc sine approximation, which was found to underestimate the actual required sample size by as much as 34%. The purpose of this note is to revise the Gail-Gart tables, giving exact sample sizes in all cases. The problem of nominal versus actual significance levels when the underlying probability of response is low is also briefly discussed.
Joseph K. Haseman (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: