Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: A review of the literature was undertaken to identify and summarize randomized trials of educational, cognitive, and behavioral interventions for people with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies of back schools have varied widely in patient characteristics, back school length and content, and comparison treatment. The available evidence suggests that back schools do not affect long-term outcomes of people with back pain. METHODS: MEDLINE and PsycLIT databases were searched to identify randomized trials of cognitive and behavioral treatments for chronic low back pain. Outcome data were extracted from articles that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The meta-analysis found that cognitive and behavioral treatments were superior to control conditions after treatment on measures of chronic low back pain, pain behavior, and disability. Follow-up comparisons of cognitive and behavioral treatments versus control conditions were not available. This meta-analysis did not find cognitive and behavioral therapies to differ from other active treatments on specific outcome measures, although only a few studies were available for each measure. CONCLUSION: It may be useful to incorporate cognitive-behavioral interventions in primary care settings, but additional research is needed to evaluate their efficacy in improving specific outcomes.
Judith A. Turner (Sun,) studied this question.