Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
I develop a method to measure the ideology of candidates and contributors using campaign finance data. Combined with a data set of over 100 million contribution records from state and federal elections, the method estimates ideal points for an expansive range of political actors. The common pool of contributors who give across institutions and levels of politics makes it possible to recover a unified set of ideological measures for members of Congress, the president and executive branch, state legislators, governors, and other state officials, as well as the interest groups and individuals who make political donations. Since candidates fundraise regardless of incumbency status, the method estimates ideal points for both incumbents and nonincumbents. After establishing measure validity and addressing issues concerning strategic behavior, I present results for a variety of political actors and discuss several promising avenues of research made possible by the new measures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adam Bonica
Stanford University
American Journal of Political Science
Stanford University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adam Bonica (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09f63587ad1657d251e626 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: