Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Despite the fact that immunohistochemistry is widely used in routine diagnostic work and is a very common part of scientific reports in pathology and cytology, its standardization still lags behind. Interpretation of immunostains should be based on microanatomic distribution of the staining, proportion of positively stained cells, staining intensity, if relevant, and cutoff levels. These parameters should be shown to be reasonably reproducible and should be clearly defined in publications. Uniformity in the setting of thresholds could probably benefit from interlaboratory control materials containing defined amounts of the target antigen. Reliable and precise quantitative immunohistochemistry requires the use of control materials containing defined amounts of the target antigen and processed alongside the specimen combined with automated computer-assisted microspectrophotometry. Application of these suggestions is hoped to improve standardization and to facilitate communication in the field of immunohistochemistry.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tomas Seidal
Hallands sjukhus Halmstad
André Balaton
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Hector Battifora
Yamamoto Hospital
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Anna Needs Neuroblastoma Answers
Karlstad Central Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seidal et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ec9e999b676b6b9af4b50 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200109000-00013