Pulse Explore Journal Club Debates Trending Researchers Journals

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Home Explore Journal Club Trending

⌘+K

Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers | Synapse

February 24, 2014Open Access

Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers

RNRichard Van NoordenUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Conference proceedings removed from subscription databases after scientist reveals that they were computer-generated.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard Van Noorden (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16b1c4b13aec50ea6b6482 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.14763

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The <scp>G</scp>oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators2013 · 238 citations
2Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science?2012 · 134 citations
3Ike Antkare one of the great stars in the scientific firmament2010 · 84 citations
4Academic Search Engine Spam and Google Scholar's Resilience Against it2010 · 72 citations
5The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level2007 · 496 citations