Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using a case study of official representations of the Holocaust in the Federal Republic of Germany, the authors address the ways in which collective memory constrains political claim-making. In contrast to the commonly held views that the past is either durable or malleable, they characterize collective memory in political culture as an ongoing process of negotiation through time. They distinguish between mythic and rational political cultural logics, and delineate mechanisms through which these logics operate as constraints : taboo and prohibition, duty and requirement. With these conceptual distinctions, they describe transformations in the memory of the Holocaust as a constraint in German political culture
Olick et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: