In stage D heart failure, hemodialysis patients had significantly elevated steady-state milrinone concentrations compared to those with normal renal function (6252 vs 451 ng/mL; P<0.05).
Cohort (n=29)
No
Does renal dysfunction increase steady state plasma milrinone concentrations in patients with stage D heart failure?
In patients with stage D heart failure, severe renal dysfunction is associated with markedly elevated steady-state milrinone concentrations and a potential increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
p-value: p=<0.05
PURPOSE: To determine steady state milrinone concentrations in patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with and without renal dysfunction METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with stage D HF at a single medical center on continuous milrinonein fusion at the time of plasma collection for entry into a research registry database. Milrinone was prescribed and titrated to improve hemodynamic and clinical status by a cardiologist. Plasma samples were obtained at steady state milrinone concentrations. Patients were stratified by creatinine clearance (CrCl) into 4 groups: group 1 (CrCl >60 mL/min), group 2 (CrCl 60-30 mL/min), group 3 (CrCl <30 mL/min), and group 4 (intermittent hemodialysis). Retrospective chart review was performed to quantify the post milrinone hemodynamic changes by cardiac catheterization and electrophysiologic changes by implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) interrogation. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were identified: group 1 (n=14), group 2 (n=10), group 3(n=3), and group 4 (n = 2). The mean infusion rate (0.391+0.08 mg/kg/min) did not differ between groups (P=0.14). The mean milrinone concentration was 451+243 ng/mL in group 1, 591+293 ng/mL in group 2, 1575+962 ng/mL in group 3, and 6252+4409 ng/mL in group 4 (P<0.05 compared to groups 1). There was no difference in post milrinone hemodynamic improvements between the groups (P=0.41). The ICD interrogation revealed limited comparisons, but 6 of the 8 post milrinone ventricular tachycardia episodes requiring defibrillation occurred in group 4 patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with stage D HF having severe renal dysfunction have elevated milrinone concentrations. Future studies of milrinone concentrations are warranted to investigate the potential risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and potential dosing regimens in renal dysfunction.
Cox et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Stage D heart failure (n=29). Continuous milrinone infusion vs. Stratification by creatinine clearance (CrCl >60, 60-30, <30 mL/min, and intermittent hemodialysis) was evaluated on Steady state milrinone concentrations (p=<0.05). In stage D heart failure, hemodialysis patients had significantly elevated steady-state milrinone concentrations compared to those with normal renal function (6252 vs 451 ng/mL; P<0.05).