Total left ventricular assist device support markedly reduced infarct size to 5.0% compared to 41.8% in control and 29.1% in partial support in a canine model of myocardial infarction.
Does total LVAD support reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion compared to partial or no LVAD support?
Total mechanical unloading with an LVAD dramatically reduces myocardial oxygen consumption and infarct size in a canine model of acute myocardial infarction.
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 41.8%
p-value: p=<0.01
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) mechanically unloads the left ventricle (LV). Theoretical analysis indicates that partial LVAD support (p-LVAD), where LV remains ejecting, reduces LV preload while increases afterload resulting from the elevation of total cardiac output and mean aortic pressure, and consequently does not markedly decrease myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2). In contrast, total LVAD support (t-LVAD), where LV no longer ejects, markedly decreases LV preload volume and afterload pressure, thereby strikingly reduces MVO2. Since an imbalance in oxygen supply and demand is the fundamental pathophysiology of myocardial infarction (MI), we hypothesized that t-LVAD minimizes MVO2 and reduces infarct size in MI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential impact of the support level of LVAD on MVO2 and infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion. METHODS: In 5 normal mongrel dogs, we examined the impact of LVAD on MVO2 at 3 support levels: Control (no LVAD support), p-LVAD and t-LVAD. In another 16 dogs, ischemia was induced by occluding major branches of the left anterior descending coronary artery (90 min) followed by reperfusion (300 min). We activated LVAD from the beginning of ischemia until 300 min of reperfusion, and compared the infarct size among 3 different levels of LVAD support. RESULTS: t-LVAD markedly reduced MVO2 (% reduction against CONTROL: -56 ± 9%, p<0.01) whereas p-LVAD did less (-21 ± 14%, p<0.05). t-LVAD markedly reduced infarct size compared to p-LVAD (infarct area/area at risk: CONTROL; 41.8 ± 6.4, p-LVAD; 29.1 ± 5.6 and t-LVAD; 5.0 ± 3.1%, p<0.01). Changes in creatine kinase-MB paralleled those in infarct size. CONCLUSIONS: Total LVAD support that minimizes metabolic demand maximizes the benefit of LVAD in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.
Saku et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=23). Total left ventricular assist device (t-LVAD) support vs. Partial LVAD support (p-LVAD) and no LVAD support (Control) was evaluated on Infarct size (infarct area/area at risk, %) (p=<0.01). Total left ventricular assist device support markedly reduced infarct size to 5.0% compared to 41.8% in control and 29.1% in partial support in a canine model of myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: