Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
2010๋ 1์๋ถํฐ ๋ฐฉ์ก๋ฒ ์ํ๋ น ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋ฐ์๋ก PPL์ ๊ฐ์ ๊ด๊ณ ๊ฐ ๊ฐ๋ฅํด์ง๋ฉด PPL์ ์์ ์ฆ๊ฐ๋ ๋ฌผ๋ก PPL์ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ๋ ์ ์ฐจ ๋ค์ํด์ง๊ณ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋ PPL์ด ๊ฐ์ง ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ์คํํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ๋์ด์ผ ํ ์ ๋์ ์ด๊ณ ์ ์ฑ ์ ์ธ ์ธก๋ฉด์ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ๋ค์ด ์กด์ฌํ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์ข ๋ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ฒํ ํ๋ ์์ ์ด ์๊ตฌ๋๊ณ ์๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ๋ณธ ๋ ผ๋ฌธ์์๋ ๊ตญ๋ด ๋ฐ ํด์ธ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ PPL๊ท์ ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํตํด ๊ตญ๋ด์ PPL ํ์ฑ๋ฐฉ์์ ๋ง๋ จํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ๋จผ์ PPL์ ์์ฅ ์ํฉ์ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ณ , ํ๊ตญ์ PPL์์ฅ์ด ์ธ๊ตญ๊ณผ ๋น๊ตํ์ ๋ ์ด๋ค ์ํฉ์ ์๋๊ฐ๋ฅผ ์์ ๋ณด์๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ๋ฏธ๊ตญ, ์ผ๋ณธ ๋ฐ ์ค๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ ๋ฝ์ ์ฃผ์ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ PPL๊ท์ ๋ฐฉ์์ด ํ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ๋ค๋ฅธ๊ฐ๋ฅผ ์ดํด ๋ณด์๋ค. ๋ํ PPL ๊ท์ ์ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ณผ ์์ ๋ค์ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ณ , ํ์ค์ ์ธ PPL ๊ท์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๋ํด ์ฐ๊ตฌํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ PPL ๊ท์ ์ ๋ํ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ์ ์ ํ์๊ณ , ๊ธฐ์ ๊ณผ ์ ๋ถ ์ฐจ์์์ PPL ํ์ฑํ๋ฅผ ์ํ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ ๋ฑ์ ์ ์ํด ๋ณด์๋ค. As PPL has become available since the proposal of the revised enforcement ordinances of the Broadcast Law in January 2010, not only PPL has become increased in its quantity but its method has also become diversified gradually. However, there are problems in institutional and policy aspects in order to realize its potentials, and it needs to be reviewed more concretely. Consequently, the study aims to provide domestic PPL activation plans by the research of domestic and international PPL regulations PPL market situation was examined preferentially, and then Korean PPL market situation was compared to foreign countries' counterpart. In order that, PPL regulation plan of US, Japan, China, and other major Europe countries were compared to Korean's one. The problems and issues related to PPL regulation was also looked into, and practical PPL regulation plan was researched. According to that, improvement plan of PPL regulation and methodology to revitalize PPL in respect of business and government were suggested
Young Ran (Tue,) studied this question.