Multipoint pacing significantly increased the percentage of acute responders (cardiac index increase ≥10%) compared with conventional biventricular pacing (85.2% vs 62.9%, P<0.001).
27 consecutive patients evaluated for acute haemodynamics and dyssynchrony using different pacing configurations.
Multipoint pacing (MPP) vs Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
Acute responders (cardiac index increase ≥10%), p=<0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 85.2% vs 62.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
AIMS: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of multipoint pacing (MPP) on acute haemodynamics, cardiac contractility, and left ventricle (LV) dyssynchrony, in comparison with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: An open-label, non-randomized, single-centre, prospective study was designed. Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. Evaluation of pacing configurations was performed in a random order. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to obtain haemodynamic and dyssynchrony parameters. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly superior in MPP compared with baseline (38.4 ± 1.8% vs. 26.1 ± 2.2%; P < 0.001), and in conventional pacing configuration compared with baseline (33.2 ± 1.8% vs. 26.1 ± 2.2%; P = 0.007). Cardiac index (CI) was increased by 21.8 ± 5.4% and 34.7 ± 5.1% in conventional and MPP configurations, respectively (P = 0.19). Percentage of acute responders (CI increase ≥10%) was 62.9 and 85.2% in conventional and MPP, respectively (P < 0.001). LV dyssynchrony was defined by radial strain rate parameters. Baseline anteroseptal-to-posterior wall time delay was 168 ± 21 ms. It was reduced until 70.4 ± 29 ms in conventional and -6.6 ± 11 ms in MPP (conventional vs. baseline P = 0.04; MPP vs. conventional P = 0.05). Standard deviation of the time-to-peak radial strain of the 6 LV basal segments was 101 ± 9.7, 80.3 ± 9.2, and 66 ± 8.03 ms in baseline, conventional, and MPP configurations, respectively (MPP vs. basal P = 0.012). Finally, we observed a positive correlation (r = 0.69) between reduction in dyssynchrony and CI increase (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MPP showed a further reduction in LV dyssynchrony compared with conventional biventricular pacing. Moreover, MPP resulted in an additional improvement in LVEF and in CI, and this was translated into a higher number of acute responders to CRT.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joaquín Osca
Electrophysiology
Pau Alonso
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
Óscar Cano
Electrophysiology
EP Europace
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Osca et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=27). Multipoint pacing (MPP) vs. Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was evaluated on Acute responders (cardiac index increase ≥10%) (p=<0.001). Multipoint pacing significantly increased the percentage of acute responders (cardiac index increase ≥10%) compared with conventional biventricular pacing (85.2% vs 62.9%, P<0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2284f600d432b2e1910ab6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv211