General population
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models
Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Due to an excess of poorly validated CVD risk models, future research should prioritize external validation and head-to-head comparison of existing models over developing new ones.
There is an excess of models predicting incident CVD in the general population. The usefulness of most of the models remains unclear owing to methodological shortcomings, incomplete presentation, and lack of external validation and model impact studies. Rather than developing yet another similar CVD risk prediction model, in this era of large datasets, future research should focus on externally validating and comparing head-to-head promising CVD risk models that already exist, on tailoring or even combining these models to local settings, and investigating whether these models can be extended by addition of new predictors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Johanna AAG Damen
Lotty Hooft
Ewoud Schuit
BMJ
Stanford University
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Damen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69990ae5d6891b760e7aa319 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2416
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: