Competitive sport participation showed no significant differences in QTc and JTc intervals compared to recreational sporting activities among physically fit university students.
Cross-Sectional (n=485)
The use of Seattle criteria rather than ESC criteria significantly reduces the proportion of physically fit students and athletes diagnosed with prolonged QTc, and JTc may be a better parameter for estimating repolarization time.
In literature, data on the prevalence of prolonged and shortened corrected QT (QTc) have shown considerable variability. The aim of the study was to compare QTc and JTc intervals of competitive student athletes and noncompetitive sport participants to QTc cutoff points used in athletes. A group of 485 physically fit candidates for the study of kinesiology (139 female and 346 male candidates) aged 18-20 participated in the study. Basic anthropometry, field fitness test, cardiovascular, electrocardiograms measurements, and blood sampling for lipid profile were conducted. The prolonged QTc according to European Society of Cardiology criteria was found in 2.9% of female and 4.3% of male students. When the "Seattle criteria" were used, the proportion of prolonged QTc was 1.44% in female and 0.29% in male students. The shortened QTc according to the Seattle cutoff points was presented in 0.7% of female and 2.0% of male students. The JTc over 400 ms was found in 0.72% of female and 0.29% of male students. The JTc shorter than 320 ms was presented in 0.7% of female and 1.1% of male students. No significant differences were found between students involved in competitive sport and those involved in recreational sporting activities. Female students had lower body mass index and blood pressure values, better blood lipid profile, and lower uric acid concentrations. In conclusion, the Seattle criteria markedly decreased the proportion of prolonged QTc in student athletes, particularly in male students. It seems that the JTc interval could be a better parameter than the QTc interval for the estimation of specific repolarization time in physically fit university students.
Mišigoj‐Duraković et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Physically fit students and student athletes (n=485). Competitive sport participation vs. Recreational sporting activities was evaluated on QTc and JTc intervals. Competitive sport participation showed no significant differences in QTc and JTc intervals compared to recreational sporting activities among physically fit university students.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: