Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In China, sample-based mortality surveillance systems, such as the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention's disease surveillance points system and the Ministry of Health's vital registration system, have been used for decades to provide nationally representative data on health status for health-care decision-making and performance evaluation. However, neither system provided representative mortality and cause-of-death data at the provincial level to inform regional health service needs and policy priorities. Moreover, the systems overlapped to a considerable extent, thereby entailing a duplication of effort. In 2013, the Chinese Government combined these two systems into an integrated national mortality surveillance system to provide a provincially representative picture of total and cause-specific mortality and to accelerate the development of a comprehensive vital registration and mortality surveillance system for the whole country. This new system increased the surveillance population from 6 to 24% of the Chinese population. The number of surveillance points, each of which covered a district or county, increased from 161 to 605. To ensure representativeness at the provincial level, the 605 surveillance points were selected to cover China's 31 provinces using an iterative method involving multistage stratification that took into account the sociodemographic characteristics of the population. This paper describes the development and operation of the new national mortality surveillance system, which is expected to yield representative provincial estimates of mortality in China for the first time.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shiwei Liu
Xiaoling Wu
Alan D López
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
The University of Melbourne
Western Sydney University
National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcc3be7873f5f05b133c15 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.15.153148
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: