A semimonthly home blood pressure measurement protocol resulted in significantly higher adherence (71.4%) compared to a monthly protocol (64.3%, P=0.008) over a 6-month period.
RCT (n=151)
Open-label
1:1 stratified for sex
Yes
Does semimonthly versus monthly home blood pressure monitoring using mobile phone-assisted technology improve adherence in older adults?
Mobile phone-assisted home blood pressure monitoring is feasible over 6 months, with semimonthly reminders yielding better adherence than monthly reminders.
Absolute Event Rate: 71.4% vs 64.3%
p-value: p=0.008
BACKGROUND: Mobile phone-assisted technologies provide the opportunity to optimize the feasibility of long-term blood pressure (BP) monitoring at home, with the potential of large-scale data collection. OBJECTIVE: In this proof-of-principle study, we evaluated the feasibility of home BP monitoring using mobile phone-assisted technology, by investigating (1) the association between study center and home BP measurements; (2) adherence to reminders on the mobile phone to perform home BP measurements; and (3) referrals, treatment consequences and BP reduction after a raised home BP was diagnosed. METHODS: We used iVitality, a research platform that comprises a Website, a mobile phone-based app, and health sensors, to measure BP and several other health characteristics during a 6-month period. BP was measured twice at baseline at the study center. Home BP was measured on 4 days during the first week, and thereafter, at semimonthly or monthly intervals, for which participants received reminders on their mobile phone. In the monthly protocol, measurements were performed during 2 consecutive days. In the semimonthly protocol, BP was measured at 1 day. RESULTS: We included 151 participants (mean age standard deviation 57.3 5.3 years). BP measured at the study center was systematically higher when compared with home BP measurements (mean difference systolic BP standard error 8.72 1.08 and diastolic BP 5.81 0.68 mm Hg, respectively). Correlation of study center and home measurements of BP was high (R=0.72 for systolic BP and 0.72 for diastolic BP, both P<.001). Adherence was better in participants measuring semimonthly (71.4%) compared with participants performing monthly measurements (64.3%, P=.008). During the study, 41 (27.2%) participants were referred to their general practitioner because of a high BP. Referred participants had a decrease in their BP during follow-up (mean difference final and initial standard error -5.29 1.92 for systolic BP and -2.93 1.08 for diastolic BP, both P<.05). CONCLUSION: Mobile phone-assisted technology is a reliable and promising method with good adherence to measure BP at home during a 6-month period. This provides a possibility for implementation in large-scale studies and can potentially contribute to BP reduction.
Wijsman et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Parental history of dementia (n=151). Semimonthly home blood pressure measurement vs. Monthly home blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Adherence to home blood pressure measurement protocol (p=0.008). A semimonthly home blood pressure measurement protocol resulted in significantly higher adherence (71.4%) compared to a monthly protocol (64.3%, P=0.008) over a 6-month period.