Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Research Article| September 01 2006 Neo-Conservatives, Liberal Hawks, and the War on Terror: Lessons from the Cold War Anatol Lieven; Anatol Lieven Anatol Lieven is a senior research fellow at the New America Foundation covering American strategy and international rlations. Formerly a journalist in South Asia and the former Soviet Union, his most recent book is America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism (Oxford University Press, 2004). Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google John C. Hulsman John C. Hulsman John C. Hulsman is the von Oppenheimer scholar in residence at the German Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin and a contributing editor to The National Interest. He was formerly a senior research fellow in international relations at the Heritage Foundation and has taught European security studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, and world politics and U.S. foreign policy at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google World Policy Journal (2006) 23 (3): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/wopj.2006.23.3.64 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures Neo-Conservatives, Liberal Hawks, and the War on Terror: Lessons from the Cold War. World Policy Journal 1 September 2006; 23 (3): 64–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/wopj.2006.23.3.64 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsWorld Policy Journal Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2006 World Policy Institute2006World Policy Institute Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Reflections You do not currently have access to this content.
Lieven et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: