Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To develop a novel method for rapid myocardial T 1 mapping at high spatial resolution. Methods: The proposed strategy represents a single-shot inversion recovery experiment triggered to early diastole during a brief breath-hold. The measurement combines an adiabatic inversion pulse with a real-time readout by highly undersampled radial FLASH, iterative image reconstruction and T 1 fitting with automatic deletion of systolic frames. The method was implemented on a 3-T MRI system using a graphics processing unit-equipped bypass computer for online application. Validations employed a T 1 reference phantom including analyses at simulated heart rates from 40 to 100 beats per minute. In vivo applications involved myocardial T 1 mapping in short-axis views of healthy young volunteers. Results: At 1-mm in-plane resolution and 6-mm section thickness, the inversion recovery measurement could be shortened to 3 s without compromising T 1 quantitation. Phantom studies demonstrated T 1 accuracy and high precision for values ranging from 300 to 1500 ms and up to a heart rate of 100 beats per minute. Similar results were obtained in vivo yielding septal T 1 values of 1246 ± 24 ms (base), 1256 ± 33 ms (mid-ventricular) and 1288 ± 30 ms (apex), respectively (mean ± standard deviation, n = 6). Conclusion: Diastolic myocardial T 1 mapping with use of single-shot inversion recovery FLASH offers high spatial resolution, T 1 accuracy and precision, and practical robustness and speed. Advances in knowledge: The proposed method will be beneficial for clinical applications relying on native and post-contrast T 1 quantitation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaoqing Wang
Arun Joseph
Oleksandr Kalentev
British Journal of Radiology
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a123404f7bd4f5c7da5ef4f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160255
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: