Electrophysiological maneuvers showed that a postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) <125 ms differentiated ORT from AVNRT with 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
Observational (n=19)
Do specific electrophysiological maneuvers and measurements differentiate atypical atrioventricular node-dependent long RP supraventricular tachycardias in patients with SVT?
Standard entrainment criteria are modestly sensitive but highly specific for ORT, with a PPI-TCL cutoff of 125 ms performing better than 115 ms, and specific AH criteria differentiating NFRT/AVNRT from PJRT.
Mean Difference: 58 (95% CI 26.3–89.7)
Absolute Event Rate: 118% vs 176%
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing atypical atrioventricular node-dependent long RP supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) can be challenging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen patients with 20 SVTs (atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia without n=11/with n=3 a bystander nodofascicular NF accessory pathway, orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia ORT using a decremental atrioventricular permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia; n=4 or NF NF reentrant tachycardia; n=2) accessory pathway underwent electrophysiological study. Postpacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL), corrected PPI, VA (ventriculoatrial), HA (His-atrial), AH (atrio-His) values, and responses to His-refractory ventricular premature depolarizations were studied. Compared with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, ORT patients were younger (42±13 years versus 54±19 years; P=0.036) and were women (5/6 83% versus 3/14 21%; P=0.036); TCLs were similar (435 ms versus 429 ms; 95% confidence interval, -47.5 to 35.5). PPI-TCL was shorter for ORT (118 ms versus 176 ms; 95% confidence interval, 26.3-89.7) but only 50% had PPI-TCL <115 ms, whereas 5 of 6 (83%) had PPI-TCL <125 ms (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 100%). Corrected PPI <110 ms, VA <85 ms, and HA <0 ms had equivalent sensitivity (67%) and 100% specificity for ORT. Compared with permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, NF reentrant tachycardia/atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia had longer AH (29 ms versus 10 ms; 95% confidence interval, 3.03-35.0) or AH(SVT)<AH(NSR) (normal sinus rhythm) His-refractory ventricular premature depolarizations advanced (4/8 50%), delayed (4/8 50%), or terminated (5/8 63%) SVT in all accessory pathway patients. CONCLUSIONS: This unusual SVT requires separate maneuvers to delineate its upper and lower circuit. Standard entrainment criteria are modestly sensitive but highly specific for ORT; and PPI-TCL of 125 ms seems better than 115 ms. The AH criteria, or paradoxically AH(SVT)<AH(NSR), differentiates NF reentrant tachycardia/atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia. Bystander accessory pathways were only identified by His-refractory ventricular premature depolarizations.
Ho et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Atypical atrioventricular node-dependent long RP supraventricular tachycardias (n=19). Electrophysiological study maneuvers (PPI-TCL, corrected PPI, VA, HA, AH) vs. Different SVT mechanisms (ORT vs AVNRT) was evaluated on Postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) (MD 58, 95% CI 26.3-89.7). Electrophysiological maneuvers showed that a postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) <125 ms differentiated ORT from AVNRT with 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity.