Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The PLOS ONE Collection "Measuring forest conservation effectiveness" brings together a series of studies that evaluate the effectiveness of tropical forest conservation policies and programs with the goal of measuring conservation success and associated co-benefits. This overview piece describes the geographic and methodological scope of these studies, as well as the policy instruments covered in the Collection as of June 2016. Focusing on forest cover change, we systematically compare the conservation effects estimated by the studies and discuss them in the light of previous findings in the literature. Nine studies estimated that annual conservation impacts on forest cover were below one percent, with two exceptions in Mexico and Indonesia. Differences in effect sizes are not only driven by the choice of conservation measures. One key lesson from the studies is the need to move beyond the current scientific focus of estimating average effects of undifferentiated conservation programs. The specific elements of the program design and the implementation context are equally important factors for understanding the effectiveness of conservation programs. Particularly critical will be a better understanding of the causal mechanisms through which conservation programs have impacts. To achieve this understanding we need advances in both theory and methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jan Börner
University of Bonn
Kathy Baylis
University of California, Santa Barbara
Esteve Corbera
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
PLoS ONE
Johns Hopkins University
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
University of British Columbia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Börner et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11c4f50b2fd5f9c6c90bc9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159152
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: