Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: There are few data on the long-term prognosis and chronological changes in left ventricular (LV) function after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) among the Japanese population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated the long-term prognosis in 80 consecutive patients with severe chronic AR who underwent AVR. Additionally, 65 patients with follow-up echocardiography at 1 year after AVR were investigated to evaluate chronological changes in LV function. The mean follow-up period was 8.9±5.2 years. Freedom from all-cause death and cardiac death at 10 years after AVR was 76% and 91%, respectively. The preoperative ejection fraction (EF) and estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent predictors of all-cause death. Preoperative EF, LV end-systolic diameter, and diabetes might be useful predictors of cardiac death. Among the 65 patients with follow-up echocardiographic data, LV function had normalized at 1 year after AVR in all patients, except for 2 who died of cardiac causes in the long-term after AVR. LV end-diastolic diameter, LV end-systolic diameter, and EF at 1 year after AVR might be useful predictors of long-term cardiac death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe chronic AR, preoperative LV dysfunction is remarkably improved at 1 year after AVR. Pre- and postoperative echocardiographic data are important for predicting long-term outcome after AVR. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2460-2467).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Masashi Amano
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
Chisato Izumi
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
Sari Imamura
Wakayama Medical University
Circulation Journal
Tenri Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amano et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a9715382248a45185a1ad — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-16-0782
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: