A magnitude-based unwrapping error correction method improved the robustness of B0 mapping and resulted in better fat-water separation compared with conventional techniques in 9 patients.
A novel magnitude-based correction method improves the robustness of B0 mapping and fat-water separation in bipolar two-point Dixon cardiac MRI.
PURPOSE: The conventional two-point (2pt) Dixon technique explicitly estimates B0 map by performing phase unwrapping. When signal loss, phase singularity, artifacts, or spatially isolated regions corrupt the measured phase images, this unwrapping-based technique will face difficulty. This work aims to improve the reliability of B0 mapping by performing unwrapping error correction. METHOD: To detect the unwrapping-caused phase errors, we determined a magnitude-based fat/water mask and used it as reference to identify pixels being mismatched by the phase-based mask, which was derived from the B0-corrected phase term of the Hermitian product between echoes. Then, we corrected the afore-determined phase error on a region-by-region basis. We tested the developed method with nine patients' data, and the results were compared with a well-established region-growing technique. RESULTS: By adding the step to correct unwrapping-caused error, we improved the robustness of B0 mapping, resulting in better fat-water separation when compared with the conventional 2pt and the phasor-based region-growing techniques. CONCLUSION: We showed the feasibility of B0 mapping with bipolar 2pt human cardiac data. The software is freely available to the scientific community. Magn Reson Med 78:1862-1869, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Liu et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Cardiac MRI (n=9). Magnitude-based unwrapping error correction for B0 mapping vs. Conventional 2pt and phasor-based region-growing techniques was evaluated on Robustness of B0 mapping and fat-water separation. A magnitude-based unwrapping error correction method improved the robustness of B0 mapping and resulted in better fat-water separation compared with conventional techniques in 9 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: