Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Advances in high-throughput sequencing have led to an unprecedented growth in genome sequences being submitted to biological databases. In particular, the sequencing of large numbers of nearly identical bacterial genomes during infection outbreaks and for other large-scale studies has resulted in a high level of redundancy in nucleotide databases and consequently in the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB). Redundancy negatively impacts on database searches by causing slower searches, an increase in statistical bias and cumbersome result analysis. The redundancy combined with the large data volume increases the computational costs for most reuses of UniProtKB data. All of this poses challenges for effective discovery in this wealth of data. With the continuing development of sequencing technologies, it is clear that finding ways to minimize redundancy is crucial to maintaining UniProt's essential contribution to data interpretation by our users. We have developed a methodology to identify and remove highly redundant proteomes from UniProtKB. The procedure identifies redundant proteomes by performing pairwise alignments of sets of sequences for pairs of proteomes and subsequently, applies graph theory to find dominating sets that provide a set of non-redundant proteomes with a minimal loss of information. This method was implemented for bacteria in mid-2015, resulting in a removal of 50 million proteins in UniProtKB. With every new release, this procedure is used to filter new incoming proteomes, resulting in a more scalable and scientifically valuable growth of UniProtKB.Database URL: http://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Borisas Bursteinas
European Bioinformatics Institute
Ramona Britto
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Benoît Bely
European Bioinformatics Institute
Database
Wellcome Trust
European Bioinformatics Institute
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bursteinas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080322217278811afe171c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw139
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: