Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to consider the proposal by Peter Li about developing an inclusive research paradigm bringing together eastern and western research approaches; and second, to make a proposal for a division of labor in this endeavor. Design/methodology/approach Literature review and consideration of opposing intellectual traditions and their origins. Findings If the western approach was to deal with structures and institutions, and the eastern approach was to deal with process, then some progress might be possible toward a valuable fusion. But there may be sociological as well as intellectual reasons why this would be difficult. Research limitations/implications As it is a commentary there are no specific limitations except for what can be covered in the space available. Practical implications If the proposal can be made to bear fruit the chances of much greater East-West collaboration in research are higher. Social implications The reduction of friction and non-cooperation between intellectual traditions. Originality/value The “process” suggestion is new in this form.
Gordon Redding (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: